From San Francisco:

Prpos 94-97: Allocation of Indian gaming revenue (estimated at 9 billion over 20
years, 450 million per year).

Concerns that the Indian tribes involved are the four wealthiest tribes, and
exert influence over smaller tribes without oversight. Concerns about labor
laws. Supported by Schwarzenegger. Bay Guardian summary: four wealthy tribes
gain rights to expand urban gambling. Opposed by Labor, Environmental,
Education, Senior, Civil Rights organizations.

SK proposed statement: support for Native Americans, these measures do not
address Native American soverenty; gambling preys on desperate people in
general, and the revenue generated would disproportionately come from the
lowest-income segment of our population.

JMC: oppose for other reasons, lack of accountability, gambling OK (personal
responsibility.

RN: Should not be taxing Indian Gaming (impose taxes on rich, re instate auto
registration fee, etc.), for state revenue.

SV: should not support the expansion of gambling as a way of helping an
oppressed group end poverty within their tribes.